Interactomics - Oral Questions
A comprehensive collection of oral exam questions covering protein-protein interactions, interactomics methods, and advanced techniques.
1. Introduction to Interactomics
Interactomics: The study of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and the networks they form within biological systems.
Why PPIs are important:
- Functional Insight: Essential for understanding how proteins function within cells
- Pathology: Gene mutations can disrupt protein interactions — a primary driver of disease
- Drug Discovery: New drug treatments rely heavily on protein function analysis
- Discovery: Unknown proteins can be discovered by identifying their partners in known pathways
Scale of the problem:
- ~2-4 million proteins per cubic micron in cells
- Number of possible interactions is enormous
- PPIs are intrinsic to virtually every cellular process: cell growth, cell cycle, metabolism, signal transduction
Key challenges:
- Identifying which proteins interact in the crowded intracellular environment
- Mapping specific residues that participate in interactions
The Bait and Prey model is the fundamental principle underlying all PPI methods:
Bait (X):
- The protein of interest
- Used to "fish" for interacting partners
- Usually tagged or labeled for detection
Prey (Y):
- Proteins that interact with the bait
- Can be known candidates or unknown proteins from a library
Types of interactions:
- Binary: One bait + one prey
- Complex: One bait + multiple preys simultaneously
The fundamental question: "Does X bind with protein Y?"
2. Classification of PPI Methods
A. Experimental Methods:
In Vitro Methods: (Purified proteins, controlled lab environment)
- Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Antibodies isolate protein complexes
- GST-Pull Down: Tagged proteins capture binding partners
- Protein Arrays: High-throughput screening on solid surface
In Vivo / Cellular Methods: (Living cells)
- Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H): Classic genetic screen for binary interactions
- Mammalian Two-Hybrid (M2H): Y2H in mammalian context
- Phage Display: Connects proteins with encoding DNA
- Proximity Labeling: BioID, TurboID, APEX
Imaging & Real-time:
- FRET: Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
- BRET: Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer
B. Computational Methods:
- Genomic data: Phylogenetic profiles, gene fusion, correlated mutations
- Protein structure: Residue frequencies, 3D distance matrices, surface patches
3. Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)
Co-IP: A technique to verify whether two or more proteins form a complex within a cell.
Principle:
- Uses antibodies to isolate protein complexes from cell extracts
- Antibody against "bait" captures bait + any bound "prey" proteins
- If proteins interact, prey co-precipitates with bait
Why it's rigorous:
- Physiological relevance: Uses whole cell extract
- Proteins in native conformation
- Contains natural cofactors and other cellular components
- Confirms interactions in near-physiological conditions
Why use eukaryotic cells?
- Enables post-translational modifications
- PTMs often required for interactions
- Reduces false negatives from missing modifications
Caveat: Coprecipitated proteins are assumed to be related to bait function — requires further verification.
- Cell Lysis:
- Lyse cells under non-denaturing conditions
- Must maintain 3D protein structure
- Denaturation would disrupt complexes and antibody recognition
- Antibody Addition:
- Add antibody specific to the "bait" protein
- Antibody captures bait + any bound prey
- Immobilization:
- Antibody-antigen complex captured on Protein A or G Sepharose beads
- These have high affinity for antibody Fc region
- Washing:
- Stringency washes remove non-binding proteins
- Must be optimized — too harsh may lose weak/transient interactions (false negatives)
- Elution & Dissociation:
- Elute complex from beads
- Dissociate using SDS sample buffer
- Evaluation:
- SDS-PAGE separation
- Western blotting with distinct antibodies for bait and prey
- Include negative control (non-specific IgG)
Co-IP Limitations:
- Requires good antibody: Antibody must be specific and high-affinity
- Cannot distinguish direct vs indirect: May capture whole complexes, not just direct interactors
- May miss transient interactions: Weak or transient interactions lost during washing
- Low throughput: Tests one bait at a time
- Non-denaturing conditions required: Limits buffer choices
- False positives: Non-specific binding to beads
- Verification needed: Results require confirmation by other methods
Essential controls:
- Negative control (IgG): Use non-specific IgG instead of specific antibody — ensures interaction is specific, not due to non-specific binding to beads
- Input control: Sample of lysate before IP — confirms proteins are present
- Beads-only control: Lysate + beads without antibody — tests non-specific bead binding
Detection controls:
- Western blot for bait — confirms successful pulldown
- Western blot for prey — verifies the interaction
4. GST-Pull Down Assay
GST-Pull Down: An affinity purification method similar to Co-IP, but uses a recombinant tagged bait protein instead of an antibody.
Key difference from Co-IP:
| Feature | Co-IP | GST-Pull Down |
|---|---|---|
| Capture agent | Antibody | GST-tagged bait protein |
| Bait source | Endogenous | Recombinant (usually E. coli) |
| Requires antibody | Yes | No |
The GST Fusion System:
- Bait protein fused to GST (glutathione-S-transferase) tag
- Expressed in E. coli
- GST increases solubility (acts as molecular chaperone)
- GST binds strongly to glutathione-agarose beads
Workflow:
- Express GST-bait fusion in E. coli
- Immobilize on glutathione beads
- Incubate with cell extract (prey source)
- Wash away non-binders
- Elute with excess glutathione (competes for GST)
- Analyze by SDS-PAGE + Western blot
5. Protein Arrays
Protein Microarrays: Miniaturized bioanalytical devices with arrayed molecules on a surface for high-throughput analysis.
Three main types:
- Analytical Protein Arrays:
- Immobilized capture agents (antibodies)
- Detect proteins in solution (analyte)
- Used for: Clinical diagnostics, biomarker discovery
- Functional Protein Arrays:
- Proteins of interest are immobilized
- Capture interacting molecules from analyte
- Used for: Mapping interactome, identifying protein complexes
- Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA):
- Complex sample immobilized on surface
- Specific probes detect target proteins within sample
- Used for: Tissue lysate analysis, pathway profiling
General workflow:
- Array fabrication (design layout, select probes)
- Substrate selection & deposition (robotic printing)
- Immobilization (attach capture molecules)
- Interaction & detection (fluorescence or MS)
Technical challenges:
- Steric Hindrance:
- Proteins are large and asymmetrical
- Immobilization can mask active sites
- Need site-specific orientation for accessibility
- Low Yield:
- Inefficient covalent attachment
- Suboptimal surface density
- Limits dynamic range
- Non-specific Adsorption:
- Proteins are "sticky"
- Hydrophobic/electrostatic binding to substrate
- Causes high background and false positives
- Conformation Fragility & Denaturation:
- Proteins are thermodynamically unstable (vs. DNA)
- Sensitive to pH, temperature, dehydration
- Loss of 3D structure = loss of activity
Artifacts: Dust particles, scratches, bleeding between spots can cause spurious signals.
6. Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H)
Y2H exploits the modularity of transcriptional activators (like GAL4).
Transcriptional activators have two separable domains:
- DNA Binding Domain (DBD):
- Recognizes and binds specific DNA sequence near promoter
- By itself, cannot activate transcription
- Just indicates which gene to activate
- Activation Domain (AD):
- Stimulates transcription by recruiting RNA Polymerase II
- By itself, cannot bind DNA
The Y2H trick:
- In nature, DBD and AD are part of one protein
- In Y2H, they are expressed as separate fusion proteins
- DBD fused to Bait (X)
- AD fused to Prey (Y)
- If X and Y interact → DBD and AD brought together → transcription activated → reporter gene expressed
Step 1: Construct Fusion Proteins
- Bait (DBD-X): Gene X inserted next to DBD (e.g., GAL4 BD)
- Prey (AD-Y): Gene Y inserted next to AD (e.g., GAL4 AD, VP16)
Step 2: Transfection & Selection
- Transform yeast with both plasmids
- Selection based on metabolic genes:
- Bait plasmid: TRP1 (growth without tryptophan)
- Prey plasmid: LEU2 (growth without leucine)
- Only double-transformants survive on -Trp/-Leu plates
Step 3: Detection of Interaction
- If X and Y interact → functional transcription factor reconstituted
- Reporter gene expressed:
- GFP: Green fluorescence
- lacZ: β-galactosidase → blue color with X-gal
- HIS3: Growth on histidine-lacking media
Y2H Limitations:
- Nuclear Localization:
- Interaction must occur in nucleus to trigger reporter
- Membrane-bound or strictly cytoplasmic proteins difficult to study
- Post-Translational Modifications:
- Yeast may lack mammalian PTM enzymes
- Missing phosphorylation/glycosylation → false negatives
- Non-native Context:
- Yeast is simple unicellular organism
- Cannot fully mimic mammalian cell environment
- Steric Hindrance:
- Large DBD/AD domains may block interaction site
- False Positives:
- Some proteins activate transcription on their own
- "Sticky" proteins bind non-specifically
Reasons to use Mammalian Two-Hybrid (M2H):
- Authentic PTMs: Glycosylation, phosphorylation, acylation present
- Native localization: Correct organelles and trafficking pathways
- Efficiency: Results in ~48 hours vs. 3-4 days for yeast
- Physiological context: Mimics human cell environment
M2H uses three plasmids:
- Bait Vector (DBD-X)
- Prey Vector (AD-Y) — often VP16 AD
- Reporter Vector (multiple DBD binding sites + TATA box + reporter)
Common reporters:
- Firefly Luciferase: Luminescent, very sensitive
- SEAP: Secreted, non-invasive (sample media without lysis)
- β-Galactosidase: Colorimetric (X-gal → blue)
Use case: M2H is used to validate interactions found in Y2H, not for primary library screening.
7. Phage Display
Phage Display: A technique where peptides/proteins are displayed on bacteriophage surfaces, creating a physical link between phenotype and genotype.
Fundamental principle:
- Foreign DNA fused to phage coat protein gene
- When phage replicates, fusion protein displayed on surface
- DNA encoding it is packaged inside
- Phenotype (displayed protein) linked to genotype (internal DNA)
Is it in vitro or in vivo?
- Production: In vivo (in E. coli)
- Selection: In vitro (on plates/beads)
- Application: In vivo (therapeutic use)
- Acts as a "bridge" technique
Biopanning (Selection Process):
- Binding: Phage library exposed to immobilized target
- Wash: Non-binders removed (acid/urea/competing ligand)
- Amplification: Bound phages re-infect E. coli and multiply
- Iteration: Repeat 3-4 cycles to enrich strong binders
- Sequencing: Identify common motifs in winners
Main limitations:
- Prokaryotic Expression System:
- No post-translational modifications (no glycosylation, phosphorylation)
- May not fold mammalian proteins correctly
- Codon bias issues
- Size Constraints:
- Large protein inserts may disrupt folding or phage assembly
- Selection Bias:
- Some peptides toxic to bacteria → lost from library
- Stringency Risks:
- First wash too harsh → lose high-affinity candidates
- In Vivo Translation:
- Peptide that works in lab may fail in living body (pH, interference)
- Misfolding:
- Complex proteins may not adopt correct 3D structure on phage surface
8. Proximity Labeling (BioID, APEX, TurboID)
Proximity Labeling: An in vivo method where an enzyme fused to bait labels all nearby proteins with biotin.
Core mechanism:
- Biotinylation: Enzyme activates biotin → reactive species tags neighbors within ~10-20 nm
- Capture: Biotin-streptavidin affinity captures tagged proteins
- Identification: MS identifies the "proteomic atlas" of bait's environment
Comparison:
| Feature | BioID | APEX | TurboID |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzyme | Biotin Ligase (BirA*) | Ascorbate Peroxidase | Evolved Biotin Ligase |
| Substrate | Biotin + ATP | Biotin-phenol + H₂O₂ | Biotin + ATP |
| Labeling Time | 18-24 hours (SLOW) | <1 minute (FAST) | 10 minutes (FAST) |
| Target AA | Lysine | Tyrosine | Lysine |
| Toxicity | Low | HIGH (H₂O₂) | Low |
| In Vivo Use | Excellent | Limited | Excellent |
TurboID is now the gold standard: combines non-toxic nature of BioID with speed of APEX.
9. FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer)
RET (Resonance Energy Transfer): Energy transfer from an excited donor to an acceptor molecule through non-radiative dipole-dipole coupling (no photon emitted).
Three critical factors affecting efficiency:
- Distance (R):
- Most important factor!
- Efficiency ∝ 1/R⁶ (inverse sixth power)
- Must be within 1-10 nm (10-100 Å)
- Relative Orientation:
- Donor and acceptor dipoles must be approximately parallel
- Perpendicular = zero transfer
- Spectral Overlap:
- Donor emission spectrum must overlap with acceptor absorption spectrum
Two main types:
- FRET: Donor is fluorescent (requires external light)
- BRET: Donor is bioluminescent (no external light needed)
FRET = Förster (or Fluorescence) Resonance Energy Transfer
How it works:
- Excitation: External light excites the donor fluorophore
- Energy Transfer: Instead of emitting light, donor transfers energy to acceptor via dipole-dipole coupling (non-radiative)
- Acceptor Emission: Acceptor becomes excited and emits light at its characteristic wavelength
Donor and Acceptor:
- Donor: Fluorescent protein that absorbs excitation light (e.g., CFP - Cyan Fluorescent Protein)
- Acceptor: Fluorescent protein that receives energy from donor (e.g., YFP - Yellow Fluorescent Protein)
Common FRET pairs:
- CFP → YFP
- BFP → GFP
- GFP → mCherry/RFP
Measurable result:
- Donor emission decreases (quenching)
- Acceptor emission appears (sensitized emission)
BRET = Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer
Key difference: Donor is a bioluminescent enzyme (not a fluorophore).
| Feature | FRET | BRET |
|---|---|---|
| Donor | Fluorophore (e.g., CFP) | Luciferase enzyme (e.g., Rluc) |
| Excitation | External light source | Chemical substrate (no light needed) |
| Background | High (autofluorescence) | Low (no autofluorescence) |
| Photobleaching | Yes (donor degrades) | No |
| Phototoxicity | Risk of cell damage | No photodamage |
BRET advantages:
- No external light → no autofluorescence background
- No photobleaching → longer experiments
- No phototoxicity → better cell viability
- Higher signal-to-noise ratio
Common BRET donors: Renilla luciferase (Rluc), NanoLuc
Types of signals measured:
- Sensitized emission: Acceptor fluorescence upon donor excitation
- Donor quenching: Decrease in donor fluorescence intensity
- Donor lifetime: Decrease in fluorescence lifetime (FLIM-FRET)
- Acceptor photobleaching: Donor recovery after acceptor is bleached
Ratiometric measurement:
- Calculate ratio of acceptor emission / donor emission
- Why it's powerful: Self-normalizing!
- Eliminates variability from: cell number, assay volume, detector fluctuations
- Results reflect true molecular interactions, not experimental artifacts
BRET Ratio formula:
BRET ratio = [I₅₃₀ - (Cf × I₄₉₀)] / I₄₉₀
- High ratio = strong interaction
- Low ratio = proteins distant or not interacting
General limitations (both):
- Steric hindrance: Large tags (GFP, Luciferase) may block interaction site
- Artifactual behavior: Fusion may change protein conformation/localization
- Overexpression artifacts: High concentrations can force non-physiological interactions
FRET-specific limitations:
- Photobleaching: Donor degrades under continuous illumination
- Autofluorescence: Endogenous molecules create background noise
- Phototoxicity: Intense light can damage cells
- Direct acceptor excitation: Can create false positives
BRET-specific limitations:
- Substrate dependency: Requires exogenous substrate addition
- Limited donor library: Fewer bioluminescent proteins available compared to fluorescent proteins
- Lower signal intensity: Bioluminescence weaker than fluorescence
10. Advanced Techniques
SRET = Sequential BRET-FRET
An advanced technique to monitor non-binary interactions (three or more proteins forming a complex).
The molecular components:
- Donor: Protein 1 fused to Renilla luciferase (Rluc)
- First Acceptor: Protein 2 fused to GFP/YFP
- Second Acceptor: Protein 3 fused to DsRed
Sequential energy transfer:
- BRET phase: Rluc → GFP (if proteins 1 & 2 are close)
- FRET phase: GFP → DsRed (if proteins 2 & 3 are close)
- Final emission: DsRed emits — confirms all three are together
Key advantage: Positive SRET signal is definitive proof that all three proteins are physically clustered at the same time.
Application: Studying GPCR oligomerization (homo- and hetero-oligomers) in drug discovery.
PCA Principle:
- Reporter protein (e.g., luciferase) split into two inactive fragments
- Fragments fused to bait and prey proteins
- If bait and prey interact → fragments brought together → reporter reconstituted → signal produced
Logic:
- No interaction → fragments separated → no activity
- Interaction → proximity → reassembly → activity restored
NanoBiT (NanoLuc Binary Technology):
- Current gold standard PCA system
- Large BiT (LgBiT): 18 kDa
- Small BiT (SmBiT): 11 amino acids
- Engineered with very weak intrinsic affinity
- Only reassemble when "forced" together by bait-prey interaction
Advantages of NanoBiT:
- High signal-to-noise ratio
- Low background (no spontaneous assembly)
- Works at physiological protein concentrations
- Superior dynamic range vs. FRET
Inteins = INternal proTEINS
Self-splicing protein segments that excise themselves from a precursor protein, leaving the flanking exteins joined together.
Terminology:
- Intein: Gets removed (internal protein)
- Extein: Flanking sequences that remain (external protein)
- N-extein—[INTEIN]—C-extein → N-extein—C-extein + free intein
Mechanism (Protein Splicing):
- N-S or N-O acyl shift at N-terminus
- Transesterification
- Asparagine cyclization releases intein
- S-N or O-N acyl shift joins exteins with native peptide bond
Applications:
- Self-cleaving affinity tags: Tag-free protein purification (no extra residues!)
- Expressed Protein Ligation: Join two protein fragments with native bond
- Protein cyclization: Create cyclic proteins
- Conditional protein splicing: Control protein activity
11. Aptamers & SELEX
Aptamers: Single-stranded oligonucleotides (ssDNA or RNA) that fold into complex 3D structures and bind targets with high affinity.
How they bind:
- Shape complementarity (not base pairing)
- Non-covalent interactions: hydrogen bonding, van der Waals, aromatic stacking
- Often called "chemical antibodies"
SELEX = Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential Enrichment
- Create library: 10⁹-10¹¹ random sequences
- Incubation: Expose library to target
- Counter-selection: Remove cross-reactive sequences (expose to non-targets)
- Wash & Elute: Remove non-binders, recover high-affinity sequences
- Amplification: PCR enrichment of winners
- Iteration: Repeat 8-15 cycles
Applications: Drugs, therapeutics, diagnostics, bio-imaging, food inspection
12. Computational Approaches
A. Experimental-based (validation):
- X-ray crystallography
- NMR spectroscopy
- Cryo-EM
B. Computational based on Genomic Data:
- Phylogenetic profiles: Proteins that co-evolve likely interact
- Gene neighborhood: Genes close on chromosome often encode interacting proteins
- Gene fusion: Proteins fused in one organism may interact in another
- Correlated mutations: Co-evolving residues suggest contact
C. Based on Protein Primary Structure:
- Residue frequencies and pairing preferences
- Sequence profile and residue neighbor list
D. Based on Protein Tertiary Structure:
- 3D structural distance matrix
- Surface patches analysis
- Direct electrostatic interactions
- Van der Waals interactions
- Docking simulations
13. Quick Review Questions
Test yourself with these rapid-fire questions:
The "Bait" in PPI studies is ❓ The protein of interest used to "fish" for interacting partners
Co-IP requires ❓ conditions Non-denaturing (to preserve 3D structure and interactions)
In GST-Pull Down, GST binds to ❓ beads Glutathione-agarose beads
Y2H requires interaction to occur in the ❓ Nucleus (to trigger reporter transcription)
The main limitation of phage display is ❓ Prokaryotic expression (no eukaryotic PTMs)
FRET requires donor and acceptor within ❓ nm 1-10 nm
BRET donor is a ❓ enzyme Bioluminescent enzyme (e.g., Luciferase)
FRET donor is a ❓ Fluorophore (e.g., CFP)
BRET advantage over FRET: no ❓ Photobleaching, autofluorescence, or phototoxicity
TurboID labeling time is ❓ ~10 minutes (vs. 18-24 hours for BioID)
APEX uses ❓ which causes toxicity H₂O₂ (hydrogen peroxide)
Inteins are used for ❓ Tag-free protein purification / protein ligation
SELEX is used to select ❓ Aptamers (high-affinity oligonucleotides)
M2H uses ❓ plasmids Three plasmids (bait, prey, reporter)
NanoBiT consists of ❓ Large BiT (18 kDa) + Small BiT (11 amino acids)
Ratiometric measurement eliminates ❓ Variability from cell number, volume, detector fluctuations
SRET can study ❓ interactions Non-binary (three or more proteins)
Common FRET pair: ❓ → ❓ CFP → YFP (Cyan to Yellow)