Interactomics - Oral Questions

A comprehensive collection of oral exam questions covering protein-protein interactions, interactomics methods, and advanced techniques.


1. Introduction to Interactomics

🎤
Oral Question Definition
Medium
What is Interactomics? Why is studying protein-protein interactions important?
✓ Model Answer

Interactomics: The study of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and the networks they form within biological systems.

Why PPIs are important:

  • Functional Insight: Essential for understanding how proteins function within cells
  • Pathology: Gene mutations can disrupt protein interactions — a primary driver of disease
  • Drug Discovery: New drug treatments rely heavily on protein function analysis
  • Discovery: Unknown proteins can be discovered by identifying their partners in known pathways

Scale of the problem:

  • ~2-4 million proteins per cubic micron in cells
  • Number of possible interactions is enormous
  • PPIs are intrinsic to virtually every cellular process: cell growth, cell cycle, metabolism, signal transduction

Key challenges:

  1. Identifying which proteins interact in the crowded intracellular environment
  2. Mapping specific residues that participate in interactions
🎤
Oral Question Bait and Prey
Easy
Explain the "Bait and Prey" model in interactomics.
✓ Model Answer

The Bait and Prey model is the fundamental principle underlying all PPI methods:

Bait (X):

  • The protein of interest
  • Used to "fish" for interacting partners
  • Usually tagged or labeled for detection

Prey (Y):

  • Proteins that interact with the bait
  • Can be known candidates or unknown proteins from a library

Types of interactions:

  • Binary: One bait + one prey
  • Complex: One bait + multiple preys simultaneously

The fundamental question: "Does X bind with protein Y?"


2. Classification of PPI Methods

🎤
Oral Question Method Classification
Hard
How are PPI experimental methods classified? Give examples of each category.
✓ Model Answer

A. Experimental Methods:

In Vitro Methods: (Purified proteins, controlled lab environment)

  • Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Antibodies isolate protein complexes
  • GST-Pull Down: Tagged proteins capture binding partners
  • Protein Arrays: High-throughput screening on solid surface

In Vivo / Cellular Methods: (Living cells)

  • Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H): Classic genetic screen for binary interactions
  • Mammalian Two-Hybrid (M2H): Y2H in mammalian context
  • Phage Display: Connects proteins with encoding DNA
  • Proximity Labeling: BioID, TurboID, APEX

Imaging & Real-time:

  • FRET: Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
  • BRET: Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer

B. Computational Methods:

  • Genomic data: Phylogenetic profiles, gene fusion, correlated mutations
  • Protein structure: Residue frequencies, 3D distance matrices, surface patches

3. Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP)

Practice Set: Co-IP
0 / 4
1
Question 1 Principle
Hard
Explain the principle of Co-Immunoprecipitation (Co-IP). Why is it considered a rigorous method?
✓ Model Answer

Co-IP: A technique to verify whether two or more proteins form a complex within a cell.

Principle:

  • Uses antibodies to isolate protein complexes from cell extracts
  • Antibody against "bait" captures bait + any bound "prey" proteins
  • If proteins interact, prey co-precipitates with bait

Why it's rigorous:

  • Physiological relevance: Uses whole cell extract
  • Proteins in native conformation
  • Contains natural cofactors and other cellular components
  • Confirms interactions in near-physiological conditions

Why use eukaryotic cells?

  • Enables post-translational modifications
  • PTMs often required for interactions
  • Reduces false negatives from missing modifications

Caveat: Coprecipitated proteins are assumed to be related to bait function — requires further verification.

2
Question 2 Workflow
Hard
Describe the Co-IP experimental workflow step by step.
✓ Model Answer
  1. Cell Lysis:
    • Lyse cells under non-denaturing conditions
    • Must maintain 3D protein structure
    • Denaturation would disrupt complexes and antibody recognition
  2. Antibody Addition:
    • Add antibody specific to the "bait" protein
    • Antibody captures bait + any bound prey
  3. Immobilization:
    • Antibody-antigen complex captured on Protein A or G Sepharose beads
    • These have high affinity for antibody Fc region
  4. Washing:
    • Stringency washes remove non-binding proteins
    • Must be optimized — too harsh may lose weak/transient interactions (false negatives)
  5. Elution & Dissociation:
    • Elute complex from beads
    • Dissociate using SDS sample buffer
  6. Evaluation:
    • SDS-PAGE separation
    • Western blotting with distinct antibodies for bait and prey
    • Include negative control (non-specific IgG)
3
Question 3 Limitations
Medium
What are the limitations of Co-IP?
✓ Model Answer

Co-IP Limitations:

  • Requires good antibody: Antibody must be specific and high-affinity
  • Cannot distinguish direct vs indirect: May capture whole complexes, not just direct interactors
  • May miss transient interactions: Weak or transient interactions lost during washing
  • Low throughput: Tests one bait at a time
  • Non-denaturing conditions required: Limits buffer choices
  • False positives: Non-specific binding to beads
  • Verification needed: Results require confirmation by other methods
4
Question 4 Controls
Medium
What controls should be included in a Co-IP experiment?
✓ Model Answer

Essential controls:

  • Negative control (IgG): Use non-specific IgG instead of specific antibody — ensures interaction is specific, not due to non-specific binding to beads
  • Input control: Sample of lysate before IP — confirms proteins are present
  • Beads-only control: Lysate + beads without antibody — tests non-specific bead binding

Detection controls:

  • Western blot for bait — confirms successful pulldown
  • Western blot for prey — verifies the interaction

4. GST-Pull Down Assay

🎤
Oral Question GST-Pull Down
Hard
Explain the GST-Pull Down assay. How does it differ from Co-IP?
✓ Model Answer

GST-Pull Down: An affinity purification method similar to Co-IP, but uses a recombinant tagged bait protein instead of an antibody.

Key difference from Co-IP:

FeatureCo-IPGST-Pull Down
Capture agentAntibodyGST-tagged bait protein
Bait sourceEndogenousRecombinant (usually E. coli)
Requires antibodyYesNo

The GST Fusion System:

  • Bait protein fused to GST (glutathione-S-transferase) tag
  • Expressed in E. coli
  • GST increases solubility (acts as molecular chaperone)
  • GST binds strongly to glutathione-agarose beads

Workflow:

  1. Express GST-bait fusion in E. coli
  2. Immobilize on glutathione beads
  3. Incubate with cell extract (prey source)
  4. Wash away non-binders
  5. Elute with excess glutathione (competes for GST)
  6. Analyze by SDS-PAGE + Western blot

5. Protein Arrays

🎤
Oral Question Protein Arrays
Hard
What are Protein Microarrays? Describe the three main types.
✓ Model Answer

Protein Microarrays: Miniaturized bioanalytical devices with arrayed molecules on a surface for high-throughput analysis.

Three main types:

  1. Analytical Protein Arrays:
    • Immobilized capture agents (antibodies)
    • Detect proteins in solution (analyte)
    • Used for: Clinical diagnostics, biomarker discovery
  2. Functional Protein Arrays:
    • Proteins of interest are immobilized
    • Capture interacting molecules from analyte
    • Used for: Mapping interactome, identifying protein complexes
  3. Reverse Phase Protein Arrays (RPPA):
    • Complex sample immobilized on surface
    • Specific probes detect target proteins within sample
    • Used for: Tissue lysate analysis, pathway profiling

General workflow:

  1. Array fabrication (design layout, select probes)
  2. Substrate selection & deposition (robotic printing)
  3. Immobilization (attach capture molecules)
  4. Interaction & detection (fluorescence or MS)
🎤
Oral Question Array Challenges
Medium
What are the main technical challenges of protein microarrays?
✓ Model Answer

Technical challenges:

  • Steric Hindrance:
    • Proteins are large and asymmetrical
    • Immobilization can mask active sites
    • Need site-specific orientation for accessibility
  • Low Yield:
    • Inefficient covalent attachment
    • Suboptimal surface density
    • Limits dynamic range
  • Non-specific Adsorption:
    • Proteins are "sticky"
    • Hydrophobic/electrostatic binding to substrate
    • Causes high background and false positives
  • Conformation Fragility & Denaturation:
    • Proteins are thermodynamically unstable (vs. DNA)
    • Sensitive to pH, temperature, dehydration
    • Loss of 3D structure = loss of activity

Artifacts: Dust particles, scratches, bleeding between spots can cause spurious signals.


6. Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H)

Practice Set: Yeast Two-Hybrid
0 / 4
1
Question 1 Principle
Hard
Explain the molecular basis of the Yeast Two-Hybrid system. What is a transcriptional activator?
✓ Model Answer

Y2H exploits the modularity of transcriptional activators (like GAL4).

Transcriptional activators have two separable domains:

  1. DNA Binding Domain (DBD):
    • Recognizes and binds specific DNA sequence near promoter
    • By itself, cannot activate transcription
    • Just indicates which gene to activate
  2. Activation Domain (AD):
    • Stimulates transcription by recruiting RNA Polymerase II
    • By itself, cannot bind DNA

The Y2H trick:

  • In nature, DBD and AD are part of one protein
  • In Y2H, they are expressed as separate fusion proteins
  • DBD fused to Bait (X)
  • AD fused to Prey (Y)
  • If X and Y interact → DBD and AD brought together → transcription activated → reporter gene expressed
2
Question 2 Workflow
Hard
Describe the Y2H experimental workflow. How is interaction detected?
✓ Model Answer

Step 1: Construct Fusion Proteins

  • Bait (DBD-X): Gene X inserted next to DBD (e.g., GAL4 BD)
  • Prey (AD-Y): Gene Y inserted next to AD (e.g., GAL4 AD, VP16)

Step 2: Transfection & Selection

  • Transform yeast with both plasmids
  • Selection based on metabolic genes:
    • Bait plasmid: TRP1 (growth without tryptophan)
    • Prey plasmid: LEU2 (growth without leucine)
  • Only double-transformants survive on -Trp/-Leu plates

Step 3: Detection of Interaction

  • If X and Y interact → functional transcription factor reconstituted
  • Reporter gene expressed:
    • GFP: Green fluorescence
    • lacZ: β-galactosidase → blue color with X-gal
    • HIS3: Growth on histidine-lacking media
3
Question 3 Limitations
Hard
What are the main limitations of the Yeast Two-Hybrid system?
✓ Model Answer

Y2H Limitations:

  1. Nuclear Localization:
    • Interaction must occur in nucleus to trigger reporter
    • Membrane-bound or strictly cytoplasmic proteins difficult to study
  2. Post-Translational Modifications:
    • Yeast may lack mammalian PTM enzymes
    • Missing phosphorylation/glycosylation → false negatives
  3. Non-native Context:
    • Yeast is simple unicellular organism
    • Cannot fully mimic mammalian cell environment
  4. Steric Hindrance:
    • Large DBD/AD domains may block interaction site
  5. False Positives:
    • Some proteins activate transcription on their own
    • "Sticky" proteins bind non-specifically
💡 Y2H is often the first method used, but results must be confirmed by other techniques in more native contexts.
4
Question 4 Mammalian 2H
Medium
Why would you use a Mammalian Two-Hybrid system instead of Y2H?
✓ Model Answer

Reasons to use Mammalian Two-Hybrid (M2H):

  1. Authentic PTMs: Glycosylation, phosphorylation, acylation present
  2. Native localization: Correct organelles and trafficking pathways
  3. Efficiency: Results in ~48 hours vs. 3-4 days for yeast
  4. Physiological context: Mimics human cell environment

M2H uses three plasmids:

  1. Bait Vector (DBD-X)
  2. Prey Vector (AD-Y) — often VP16 AD
  3. Reporter Vector (multiple DBD binding sites + TATA box + reporter)

Common reporters:

  • Firefly Luciferase: Luminescent, very sensitive
  • SEAP: Secreted, non-invasive (sample media without lysis)
  • β-Galactosidase: Colorimetric (X-gal → blue)

Use case: M2H is used to validate interactions found in Y2H, not for primary library screening.


7. Phage Display

🎤
Oral Question Phage Display Principle
Hard
What is Phage Display? Explain the fundamental principle and the "Biopanning" process.
✓ Model Answer

Phage Display: A technique where peptides/proteins are displayed on bacteriophage surfaces, creating a physical link between phenotype and genotype.

Fundamental principle:

  • Foreign DNA fused to phage coat protein gene
  • When phage replicates, fusion protein displayed on surface
  • DNA encoding it is packaged inside
  • Phenotype (displayed protein) linked to genotype (internal DNA)

Is it in vitro or in vivo?

  • Production: In vivo (in E. coli)
  • Selection: In vitro (on plates/beads)
  • Application: In vivo (therapeutic use)
  • Acts as a "bridge" technique

Biopanning (Selection Process):

  1. Binding: Phage library exposed to immobilized target
  2. Wash: Non-binders removed (acid/urea/competing ligand)
  3. Amplification: Bound phages re-infect E. coli and multiply
  4. Iteration: Repeat 3-4 cycles to enrich strong binders
  5. Sequencing: Identify common motifs in winners
🎤
Oral Question Phage Display Limitations
Hard
What are the main limitations of Phage Display?
✓ Model Answer

Main limitations:

  1. Prokaryotic Expression System:
    • No post-translational modifications (no glycosylation, phosphorylation)
    • May not fold mammalian proteins correctly
    • Codon bias issues
  2. Size Constraints:
    • Large protein inserts may disrupt folding or phage assembly
  3. Selection Bias:
    • Some peptides toxic to bacteria → lost from library
  4. Stringency Risks:
    • First wash too harsh → lose high-affinity candidates
  5. In Vivo Translation:
    • Peptide that works in lab may fail in living body (pH, interference)
  6. Misfolding:
    • Complex proteins may not adopt correct 3D structure on phage surface
💡 Key limitation to remember: Prokaryotic expression = no eukaryotic PTMs and potential protein misfolding.

8. Proximity Labeling (BioID, APEX, TurboID)

🎤
Oral Question Proximity Labeling
Hard
Explain Proximity Labeling. Compare BioID, APEX, and TurboID.
✓ Model Answer

Proximity Labeling: An in vivo method where an enzyme fused to bait labels all nearby proteins with biotin.

Core mechanism:

  1. Biotinylation: Enzyme activates biotin → reactive species tags neighbors within ~10-20 nm
  2. Capture: Biotin-streptavidin affinity captures tagged proteins
  3. Identification: MS identifies the "proteomic atlas" of bait's environment

Comparison:

FeatureBioIDAPEXTurboID
EnzymeBiotin Ligase (BirA*)Ascorbate PeroxidaseEvolved Biotin Ligase
SubstrateBiotin + ATPBiotin-phenol + H₂O₂Biotin + ATP
Labeling Time18-24 hours (SLOW)<1 minute (FAST)10 minutes (FAST)
Target AALysineTyrosineLysine
ToxicityLowHIGH (H₂O₂)Low
In Vivo UseExcellentLimitedExcellent

TurboID is now the gold standard: combines non-toxic nature of BioID with speed of APEX.


9. FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer)

Practice Set: FRET & BRET
0 / 5
1
Question 1 RET Principle
Hard
Explain the principle of Resonance Energy Transfer (RET). What factors influence efficiency?
✓ Model Answer

RET (Resonance Energy Transfer): Energy transfer from an excited donor to an acceptor molecule through non-radiative dipole-dipole coupling (no photon emitted).

Three critical factors affecting efficiency:

  1. Distance (R):
    • Most important factor!
    • Efficiency ∝ 1/R⁶ (inverse sixth power)
    • Must be within 1-10 nm (10-100 Å)
  2. Relative Orientation:
    • Donor and acceptor dipoles must be approximately parallel
    • Perpendicular = zero transfer
  3. Spectral Overlap:
    • Donor emission spectrum must overlap with acceptor absorption spectrum

Two main types:

  • FRET: Donor is fluorescent (requires external light)
  • BRET: Donor is bioluminescent (no external light needed)
2
Question 2 FRET Mechanism
Hard
Explain how FRET works. What are donor and acceptor molecules?
✓ Model Answer

FRET = Förster (or Fluorescence) Resonance Energy Transfer

How it works:

  1. Excitation: External light excites the donor fluorophore
  2. Energy Transfer: Instead of emitting light, donor transfers energy to acceptor via dipole-dipole coupling (non-radiative)
  3. Acceptor Emission: Acceptor becomes excited and emits light at its characteristic wavelength

Donor and Acceptor:

  • Donor: Fluorescent protein that absorbs excitation light (e.g., CFP - Cyan Fluorescent Protein)
  • Acceptor: Fluorescent protein that receives energy from donor (e.g., YFP - Yellow Fluorescent Protein)

Common FRET pairs:

  • CFP → YFP
  • BFP → GFP
  • GFP → mCherry/RFP

Measurable result:

  • Donor emission decreases (quenching)
  • Acceptor emission appears (sensitized emission)
3
Question 3 BRET
Hard
What is BRET? How does it differ from FRET?
✓ Model Answer

BRET = Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer

Key difference: Donor is a bioluminescent enzyme (not a fluorophore).

FeatureFRETBRET
DonorFluorophore (e.g., CFP)Luciferase enzyme (e.g., Rluc)
ExcitationExternal light sourceChemical substrate (no light needed)
BackgroundHigh (autofluorescence)Low (no autofluorescence)
PhotobleachingYes (donor degrades)No
PhototoxicityRisk of cell damageNo photodamage

BRET advantages:

  • No external light → no autofluorescence background
  • No photobleaching → longer experiments
  • No phototoxicity → better cell viability
  • Higher signal-to-noise ratio

Common BRET donors: Renilla luciferase (Rluc), NanoLuc

4
Question 4 Signal Types
Medium
What types of signals can be obtained from FRET/BRET? What is a ratiometric measurement?
✓ Model Answer

Types of signals measured:

  1. Sensitized emission: Acceptor fluorescence upon donor excitation
  2. Donor quenching: Decrease in donor fluorescence intensity
  3. Donor lifetime: Decrease in fluorescence lifetime (FLIM-FRET)
  4. Acceptor photobleaching: Donor recovery after acceptor is bleached

Ratiometric measurement:

  • Calculate ratio of acceptor emission / donor emission
  • Why it's powerful: Self-normalizing!
  • Eliminates variability from: cell number, assay volume, detector fluctuations
  • Results reflect true molecular interactions, not experimental artifacts

BRET Ratio formula:

BRET ratio = [I₅₃₀ - (Cf × I₄₉₀)] / I₄₉₀

  • High ratio = strong interaction
  • Low ratio = proteins distant or not interacting
5
Question 5 RET Limitations
Hard
What are the limitations of FRET and BRET?
✓ Model Answer

General limitations (both):

  • Steric hindrance: Large tags (GFP, Luciferase) may block interaction site
  • Artifactual behavior: Fusion may change protein conformation/localization
  • Overexpression artifacts: High concentrations can force non-physiological interactions

FRET-specific limitations:

  • Photobleaching: Donor degrades under continuous illumination
  • Autofluorescence: Endogenous molecules create background noise
  • Phototoxicity: Intense light can damage cells
  • Direct acceptor excitation: Can create false positives

BRET-specific limitations:

  • Substrate dependency: Requires exogenous substrate addition
  • Limited donor library: Fewer bioluminescent proteins available compared to fluorescent proteins
  • Lower signal intensity: Bioluminescence weaker than fluorescence

10. Advanced Techniques

🎤
Oral Question SRET
Hard
What is SRET? When would you use it instead of standard FRET/BRET?
✓ Model Answer

SRET = Sequential BRET-FRET

An advanced technique to monitor non-binary interactions (three or more proteins forming a complex).

The molecular components:

  1. Donor: Protein 1 fused to Renilla luciferase (Rluc)
  2. First Acceptor: Protein 2 fused to GFP/YFP
  3. Second Acceptor: Protein 3 fused to DsRed

Sequential energy transfer:

  1. BRET phase: Rluc → GFP (if proteins 1 & 2 are close)
  2. FRET phase: GFP → DsRed (if proteins 2 & 3 are close)
  3. Final emission: DsRed emits — confirms all three are together

Key advantage: Positive SRET signal is definitive proof that all three proteins are physically clustered at the same time.

Application: Studying GPCR oligomerization (homo- and hetero-oligomers) in drug discovery.

🎤
Oral Question PCA/NanoBiT
Hard
What are Protein-Fragment Complementation Assays (PCAs)? What is NanoBiT?
✓ Model Answer

PCA Principle:

  • Reporter protein (e.g., luciferase) split into two inactive fragments
  • Fragments fused to bait and prey proteins
  • If bait and prey interact → fragments brought together → reporter reconstituted → signal produced

Logic:

  • No interaction → fragments separated → no activity
  • Interaction → proximity → reassembly → activity restored

NanoBiT (NanoLuc Binary Technology):

  • Current gold standard PCA system
  • Large BiT (LgBiT): 18 kDa
  • Small BiT (SmBiT): 11 amino acids
  • Engineered with very weak intrinsic affinity
  • Only reassemble when "forced" together by bait-prey interaction

Advantages of NanoBiT:

  • High signal-to-noise ratio
  • Low background (no spontaneous assembly)
  • Works at physiological protein concentrations
  • Superior dynamic range vs. FRET
🎤
Oral Question Inteins
Medium
What are Inteins? What is their significance in protein engineering?
✓ Model Answer

Inteins = INternal proTEINS

Self-splicing protein segments that excise themselves from a precursor protein, leaving the flanking exteins joined together.

Terminology:

  • Intein: Gets removed (internal protein)
  • Extein: Flanking sequences that remain (external protein)
  • N-extein—[INTEIN]—C-extein → N-extein—C-extein + free intein

Mechanism (Protein Splicing):

  1. N-S or N-O acyl shift at N-terminus
  2. Transesterification
  3. Asparagine cyclization releases intein
  4. S-N or O-N acyl shift joins exteins with native peptide bond

Applications:

  • Self-cleaving affinity tags: Tag-free protein purification (no extra residues!)
  • Expressed Protein Ligation: Join two protein fragments with native bond
  • Protein cyclization: Create cyclic proteins
  • Conditional protein splicing: Control protein activity

11. Aptamers & SELEX

🎤
Oral Question Aptamers
Medium
What are Aptamers? How are they selected using SELEX?
✓ Model Answer

Aptamers: Single-stranded oligonucleotides (ssDNA or RNA) that fold into complex 3D structures and bind targets with high affinity.

How they bind:

  • Shape complementarity (not base pairing)
  • Non-covalent interactions: hydrogen bonding, van der Waals, aromatic stacking
  • Often called "chemical antibodies"

SELEX = Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential Enrichment

  1. Create library: 10⁹-10¹¹ random sequences
  2. Incubation: Expose library to target
  3. Counter-selection: Remove cross-reactive sequences (expose to non-targets)
  4. Wash & Elute: Remove non-binders, recover high-affinity sequences
  5. Amplification: PCR enrichment of winners
  6. Iteration: Repeat 8-15 cycles

Applications: Drugs, therapeutics, diagnostics, bio-imaging, food inspection


12. Computational Approaches

🎤
Oral Question Computational Methods
Medium
What computational approaches are used to study protein-protein interactions?
✓ Model Answer

A. Experimental-based (validation):

  • X-ray crystallography
  • NMR spectroscopy
  • Cryo-EM

B. Computational based on Genomic Data:

  • Phylogenetic profiles: Proteins that co-evolve likely interact
  • Gene neighborhood: Genes close on chromosome often encode interacting proteins
  • Gene fusion: Proteins fused in one organism may interact in another
  • Correlated mutations: Co-evolving residues suggest contact

C. Based on Protein Primary Structure:

  • Residue frequencies and pairing preferences
  • Sequence profile and residue neighbor list

D. Based on Protein Tertiary Structure:

  • 3D structural distance matrix
  • Surface patches analysis
  • Direct electrostatic interactions
  • Van der Waals interactions
  • Docking simulations

13. Quick Review Questions

Test yourself with these rapid-fire questions:

The "Bait" in PPI studies is The protein of interest used to "fish" for interacting partners

Co-IP requires ❓ conditions Non-denaturing (to preserve 3D structure and interactions)

In GST-Pull Down, GST binds to ❓ beads Glutathione-agarose beads

Y2H requires interaction to occur in the Nucleus (to trigger reporter transcription)

The main limitation of phage display is Prokaryotic expression (no eukaryotic PTMs)

FRET requires donor and acceptor within ❓ nm 1-10 nm

BRET donor is a ❓ enzyme Bioluminescent enzyme (e.g., Luciferase)

FRET donor is a Fluorophore (e.g., CFP)

BRET advantage over FRET: no Photobleaching, autofluorescence, or phototoxicity

TurboID labeling time is ~10 minutes (vs. 18-24 hours for BioID)

APEX uses ❓ which causes toxicity H₂O₂ (hydrogen peroxide)

Inteins are used for Tag-free protein purification / protein ligation

SELEX is used to select Aptamers (high-affinity oligonucleotides)

M2H uses ❓ plasmids Three plasmids (bait, prey, reporter)

NanoBiT consists of Large BiT (18 kDa) + Small BiT (11 amino acids)

Ratiometric measurement eliminates Variability from cell number, volume, detector fluctuations

SRET can study ❓ interactions Non-binary (three or more proteins)

Common FRET pair: ❓ → ❓ CFP → YFP (Cyan to Yellow)